Filed: April 3,
2015
Opinion by: James
K. Bredar
Holding: Confidential communications between a husband
and wife are privileged, regardless of whether the subject matter relates solely
to ordinary business matters.
Facts: Defendant managing members of defendant LLC were also husband and wife. In connection with discovery, husband
and wife asserted marital privilege to bar production of 58 documents involving
communications between husband and wife.
Analysis: Plaintiff argued the documents should be produced
in discovery because the communications related to pure business matters
unrelated to the spousal relationship. Plaintiff’s
argument relied on a comparison to New York law, which has statutory text
similar to Maryland. The court agreed New
York law excludes from the martial privilege conversations related solely to “ordinary
business matters.” However, the court looked
to the Maryland Court of Appeals decision in Coleman
v. State, which “refused to read exceptions into the marital privilege
where the text [(Section 9-105 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article)]
itself had ‘no express exceptions.’” The court found the communications between the husband and wife privileged.
The court went on to state that the parties must still determine
whether the communications were confidential because the privilege does not
apply if the communications were “made with the contemplation or expectation
that a third party would learn” of the communications.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please Post Comments Here