Filed December 11, 2013
Opinion by Judge Richard D. Bennett
Holding: A business operator does not have implied duty to
protect the public from lawful actions of third parties partaking in the business’
activities.
Facts: Plaintiff was struck in the leg by a golf ball while living
in a condominium adjacent to a golf course owned by the Defendant. Prior to
this incident, occupants of the condominium complained to the Defendant after
errant shots damaged the building. The Defendant elected not to alter the
course because of costs. The Defendant moved for summary judgment arguing it did not have a duty to protect the
condominium residents.
Analysis: A business is not required to control the actions
of third-parties lawfully partaking in business, unless a “special
relationship” exists between the business and the injured party. In most
instances a special relationship is created by either statute or contract. However,
the Court acknowledged that a special relationship may be implied by either
“(1) the inherent nature of the relationship between the parties; or (2) by one
party undertaking to protect or assist the other party, and thus often inducing
reliance upon the conduct of the acting party.” The Defendant did not have a direct
relationship with the Plaintiff and the Defendants never offered to protect the
condominium residents.
The Court granted the motion for summary judgment.
The full opinion is available in PDF.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please Post Comments Here